A Master’s Academy - Part 7 - The Finale!
Jesus says you have taught this from afar, isn’t time you looked at your own now. If this association is dedicated in its own mind to the provision of itself in space/time, everything in all the universe is healing that mind in its association with itself. The final step is only the translation of that self-identity to its own wholeness. The requirement for the continuing necessity of the release is what a communicator is. I don’t care whether he recognizes that he’s communicating or not. I understand that he will recognize it at some level, but it doesn’t concern me because it is always past anyway. Now I can see that space/time is a fabric of time, fabric of thought, and that that mind is all there is in a continual reassociation of itself. Your only question, then, to yourself is: “What am I doing here and why am I doing it?” There is no answer to that. If you ask the question in the transition of your own mind, you will have the experience of your own whole self that was the manifestation of the necessity for the transformation.
Both selves are the same because there is only one Self. The self that communicates with its own self in its limited identity is in the transition of the recognition of the singularness of its own mind. And I say “its” in the concept that it is not real. That’s very reasonable to me. Now, the experience of the passion of that, is your necessity to create. This is the declaration that if you are not happy and joyous all the time, you simply are not using your own creative mind. It is so deep and thick here that you really think that this is solid. You make a solid hand here to make this solid for you. It is not solid. There’s no such thing as solid.
If you take thick energy or thick light for a moment, you can compact it into a limited identity association. Did you hear that? Isn’t that what you are doing with your mind? So there you stand. With all of this crap outside of you, you’ve compacted yourself within your own identity. And you are very fearful of what’s out there. I can’t understand what you are teaching in your own concepts. What’re you going to do? What are you going to do in your own mind? I know I teach it as a philosophy but I can’t get you to look at anything you do. It is so strange to me that you do that. What are you getting out of this? Did you ever look at that? Is that the fundamental premise? Not really. You keep kicking it out and saying no, that’s not true. Can I teach you that it’s only your mind? Well, what do you do? Just keep proving that objects are real? You keep proving that that object is real in your own mind. And that these associations in your own separate mind – I just read you this – are actually separate minds talking to you, and you need to know who they are by asking them questions about themselves. Of course that’s what you are doing. And you like some of them better than others. I have no problem with that. I’m not trying to take it away from you. I’m just trying to get you to look at it. You like some of them so much that you’ll eliminate all the other ones. And then you grasp that one in your own mind and it falls apart on you, but you cling to it as long as you can. What a sorry frigging state you are in. And not only that, but you like it. There isn’t anything out there! I must construct it in my own mind. It’s going to fall apart, so I’ll hold on to it.
I’m offering you no solution to this at all – none. None. In this advanced teaching I’m not offering you a solution. You are going to say to me: “Well, what’s the solution?” and I’m just going to say: “How the hell do I know?” Who are you asking for the solution to the problem except someone that you are going to hear within your own association? Can you hear me? Can you teach it this way? I don’t know. But it is true. Do you see that? This is only an awakening from your own dream identity. “Well, look at the lovely manner that I’m waking up in.” What the hell are you talking about? Any of the associations of your own mind will be just exactly conflictual or as harmonious as you want them to be. I understand you need the conflict. Who else would you ask for the solution?
All I want you to see that if God is Love and whole, it would be impossible for you to ask for the solution to conflict without experiencing it. If you’ll admit to me what I just read you – that it is in your own mind. Obviously you deny that, and you seek relief in your own perceptual mind. What’s real hard for you is the admission of the necessity for the hardware. If suddenly somebody’s sick in your family and dying, you think somehow that in your mind you have to overcome that and see that as unreal. That’s exactly the opposite of what I’m teaching you. I am not teaching you to give specific references. I am teaching you to accept it as inevitable in your own process. That’s about as close as I can get to it. The problem I have with that is that you immediately accept it and make it a part of yourself. But if I’m going to sink it this low to have an Academy, I’ll do it. Because those who are going to hear this will hear it. You’ll notice that these real advanced associations, the moment that they heard this, that was it. And you say: “That wasn’t true with me,” and I’ll say, the hell it wasn’t. I’m not concerned at all at how long you’ve been working on this.
I’m standing here offering total release to you. You are the one that brings the baggage. So one thought is the same as any other thought? And the creative mind only releases and that’s the experience of joy? Love is letting go of fear? The proof that they will want to hear it, if there is a they, or if you want to hear it – were you were in enough pain? You were in enough association with your own existence to see that there must be another answer outside of you. Do you understand that? God is a concept? There is no conceptual identity in reality because all of the concepts are the same in reality. It doesn’t make any difference what the form is.
You are in an experience of metamorphosis, awakening from a self-identity to eternity. An evolution of your mind. What’s wrong with that? What else would you intend to do? You are aware of evolution. What are you going to evolve to? Death? How can you evolve to death? You already are dead. You are already in limitation. Seek and ye shall find. Seek you had to and find you did. Why? Seeking and finding are the same thing. So you are always getting what you are looking for. If I throw it away, what do you do? Grab it again? “If I can cling to this long enough.” Right? “I’ll hold on to it long enough.” Is that what you are going to tell me in your own mind? Long enough to what? You can’t hold on to it long enough to find life because all you are finding is death. You’ve already admitted by holding on to it, you are going to lose it? Is holding on to a thought the same as losing it? All: Yes. If I defend myself, I am attacked. Do you want the sentences, dummy? I’m just giving you the philosophy.
Obviously if you defend yourself, you are going to be attacked. Otherwise why would you hold on to it? It must be something has a great deal of frailty. If you can hold on to it, you can protect it, and it becomes a part of you protecting it. And you are very vulnerable. And there is something out there that’s going to take it away from you. Whew! And there is. How am I going to get out of that? I’m in a dilemma of cause and effect. I have to give myself an identity; therefore, I must protect myself from something. I don’t know what it is, but I must protect myself from it. Because my reality is based on the protection of myself in my own association. What’s the solution? Shall I tell you?
Don’t protect yourself. I don’t understand why I couldn’t stand on the Mount and tell you this. And did. All I ever really told you is: don’t protect yourself. I didn’t mean to have this fall down into doctrine. But any association who’s going to teach you subjective reality has got to teach you not to protect yourself. Obviously the lesson is you are protecting yourself from your own attack thoughts. And you can get this perceptually and say: “Yes, I know I’m attacking myself,” but it is quite another thing to release the necessity for it. But in that is salvation. And literally in nothing else, because it is true that you are protecting yourself from yourself. Don’t protect your own identity and you will experience love. Then you’ll lose identity.
And you’ll discover that by giving it away that you can keep it. But not in the sense of giving it away specifically but only in the sense of knowing that by giving you are creating. Do you see that? Any possessions then will make you want to give more and that’s a fact. You can say: “Well, we all need a minimum to survive.” I don’t even know what the hell you are talking about. “We have to sort this out somewhere. There’s a difference in mammon, I can sort out what I need against what I want, and I’m able to tell the difference. The main thing is that I can survive. And I can continue to study the process by which I’m coming to know this.” How simple the uncompromisingness of this! It is never true. Death is never true. Obliviation is never true. It never was, and it never will be. I’m here to tell you that. Your acceptance of it is what salvation is. That’s how simple this is.
This is a direct confrontation of a cognition of yourself in your own mind. There is no other mind but yours, whether awake or sleep. There isn’t any such thing as a sleeping mind. You can be hell-bent on proving it, go ahead. But then you don’t need me. Because your proof lies in sickness and death. Who is here to deny you that? No one. You’ve constructed in your mind all of the forms that will verify yourself. You keep asking yourself what the solution to the problem is. Don’t you understand that? The asker is the unreal part of it. He wouldn’t have to ask if he knew. But if he doesn’t know, he’s not real. Who is it that says: “Who am I?” Somebody who really doesn’t know? What is it that doesn’t know what beingness is? Whatever it is, it has every reason to protect itself in its own mind. You are fearful of what I’m offering you because it is a loss of your own protective association.
Do you have the feeling that you are popping in and out of time? I usually don’t direct perceptual minds to it because wherever you are, you are always in this perception. But actually they’re always only over. Individual transformation. I’m not trying to alleviate your guilt. I’m trying to make you totally guilty.
-Master Teacher 
Visit www.acimi.com (catalog link) to order the whole book, "Illuminations" that this talk is taken from.
Also visit www.themiraclesnetwork.com for free downloads of our videos and publications!
God Bless Us…each and EVERY ONE!
So you are at the Academy and you are saying: “Yes, I am having this experience.
So I’ll give you the written stuff on the Academy.
"If you are what you choose your brother be, alternatives were there to choose among, and someone must have first decided on the one to choose, and let the other go. Although this step has gains, it does not yet approach a basic question. This is very simple. Something must have gone before these concepts of the self. And something must have done the learning which gives rise to them. Nor can this be explained by either view of the self.
The world can teach no images of you unless you want to learn them. There will come a time when images have all gone by and you will see you know not what you are – you’ve gotten there. It is to this unsealed and open mind that truth returns, unhindered and unbound. Where concepts of the self have been laid by is truth revealed exactly as it is. When every concept has been raised to doubt and question and been recognized as made on no assumption that would stand the light, there is the truth left free to enter into its sanctuary clean and free of guilt.
"Obviously each moment you are whole and perfect with God because that’s what mind is. You are not going to not be that. That’s such a direct threat to the association that obviously he crucifies it the instant it comes into his mind. He must take the fundamental teachings – I’ll use Jesus, or any whole mind – and immediately deny it because he’s what that is. So this is a direct demand that he reassociate in his own mind his own inevitability of his revolutionary, evolutionary process of the species of man to Universal Mind that is out there, by directing it to his own self-identity. That’s what this says.
It also shows some glimmering of sight in perceptual laws that what you see reflects the state of the perceiver’s mind. That’s a statement of fact, isn’t it? You have it that far. This is Sartre. This is Kant. This is Schopenhauer. This is all of the philosophers. If you read them now, they’ll be saying exactly this, that somewhere they have seen the unreasonableness of objective reality – that something out there in space/time could really direct them to a body association. It is an admission that they don’t know who they are, really, and that by nothing that they do in objective reality can they come to know who they are. That becomes a philosophy of existentialism. No question about it. But this says no matter how much you re-examine yourself in that association, you cannot gain knowledge of yourself because the process is transcendental rather than self-inclusive.
Jakob Böhme, the great Christian mystic, says, “In a moment I knew more than anyone could learn in Universal Mind.” It’s all in there. Learning, then, is a process of inclusion rather than subtraction. That’s what we’re teaching. This is a process of inclusion, one mind. You listen. You can’t do what you are going to do now in a half measure. If you are going to have an Academy, you have to really make it earthy. My problem is not doing it or not, my problem is how you associate with it. I’m talking to you individually. My problem is how much you really think in your own perceptual mind that a whole mind is giving credence to the perceptual identity. It’s giving none. This is the whole basis of the Course.
That’s the Course in Miracles. What is a concept but a thought to which its maker gives a meaning of his own? And the guy says, “Of course I’m doing that!” And you know it. There’s no attempt here at all to make the consciousness say, “There’s a whole thing here that I’m here conceptually to tell you about.” That’s not how you teach this. He is in a continual self-examination of himself in his own identity. That’s what he is, isn’t he? Concepts maintain the world that you see. But they cannot be used to demonstrate that the world is real. Let me see you do it. Now, if the conceptual association says, “I’m satisfied with these forms that are around me, giving me an identity,” obviously he will maintain his satisfaction with that. But you remember this, wherever he is in his own associations has nothing to do with reality at all, and that in fact is this whole teaching. Reassociation does not really have to do with reality, but only with the transformation from the separate, or unreality, to the reality. Right? 
"So, at the Academy you will teach dance and you will teach painting. Isn’t that a strange and amazing idea? In other words, you are making a provision to allow for the experience; to not deny it, which is really what you are saying. Your preamble says, “Come with an open mind and share the experience of our mutual reality.” Is this it? Try to formulate it in his mind. Obviously you cannot give any attention to a single perceptual obstacle. No. This has nothing to do with the conflict in individual form associations. Is this so? All right. And it is individual. You are teaching individual transformation. There’s obviously no way you can force that transformation on them. But you can reason with them, through their own self-identity, to an assertion that they are more than the objective reality in which they find themselves. Very lovely.
Do you know what the toughest re-association will be? The physical aspects of it. I’m going to tell you this. You have taken for granted, hopefully, somewhere, at least without too much denial, that you are undergoing physical changes in your body association. It is very important that we have a class on endorphins. I don’t care if you call them endorphins, or magnetic cellular synapses of re-association, because the admission of the on-going process can be fit very well into the accord of the transformation if you don’t deal with it specifically. If you want to correlate the chakras as the churches, I think that’s lovely. You’ll have a hundred people who have come here that are going to verify Edgar Cayce’s Armageddon. I don’t care. What do I care? I already know you are doing that. Is it possible that you guys reach that on your own, without me? There’s no question that I’m giving you direction. I know what I’m doing. I’m just teaching total abstraction of God, or re-association, and providing you a mechanism. 
"Do you want to look at that a minute? What you are saying, then, is that this is a natural process of perceptual mind – yours. The Academy does not evolve from the continued perceptual associations, but only their reassertions in a broader range of conceptual self – creative self-expression – the admission of the evolution of man. Is that it? That’s what everybody says. Everybody says that man is evolving. You are saying that you can have a structural location where you would actually accelerate the evolutionary reassociation of individual man in his mind? In essence it would have nothing to do with the conceptual association at all, except in the mutual creative purpose of the nobility of man. You have to teach this real gently initially. You teach it like Ralph Waldo – that man is more than the sum of his fearful part associations with himself. And that’s acceptable to everybody, right?
Dearest Ones,
It is all happening very quickly now. The main message is to stay present…stay ready for anything! Listen…and hear the Voice speaking to you from out of time…follow your guiding light. Listen, receive and be glad! Just let everything go and come with totally empty hands to God. Let yourself be filled up with Light and give what you have been given…SHINE! Let every encounter be one of complete forgiveness and love…the miracle is ever present. There is no past. We are totally here with and for each other and there is nothing to fear. This is just the beginning…
I Love you more than I ever thought possible!!! Kristen 
Through his unequivocal full-endeavor, the Master Teacher has demonstrated and continues to demonstrate the very real process of your own personal resurrection and enlightenment attained through Self-Discovery and your singular transition from death to eternal life that is happening right now. This is the time. This is the place. So be it. You cannot not but discover to your happy amazement that you are in fact and always have been, eternal and perfect as God created you.
All of you out there, wherever of whenever you think you are, you are invited to this gathering. This is a celebration of the homecoming of the Teachers of God. You are one of us as we are one together. We invite you to the miraculous advent of the reunion of your mind with the Mind of God. You’ve come a long way; you are very much closer to the end of time than you realize. Now is it time at last to free yourself from this chaotic world of loneliness and loss and pain and death. A world constructed by your own nightmare of self-identity. It was only a meaningless place that justified your continuing need of self-sacrifice and annihilation. You have been using it in order o verify and sustain your apparent existence, and now at last it has become intolerable to you.
This new video is incredible beyond all description!
Failure is all about you while you seek for goals that cannot be achieved. You look for permanence in the impermanent; for love where there is none; for safety in the midst of danger; immortality within the darkness of the dream of death. Who could succeed where contradiction is the setting of his searching, and the place to which he comes to find stability?